Predicate logics without the structure rules

نویسنده

  • Yuichi Komori
چکیده

In our previous paper [5], we have studied Kripke.type semantics, for propositional logics without the contraction rule. In this paper, we will extend our argument to predicate logics without the structure rules. Similarly to the propositional case, we can not carry out Henkin's construction in the predicate case. Besides, there exists a difficulty that the rules of inference (~V) and (=1~) are not always vali4 in our semantics. So, we have to introduce a notion of normal models. In this paper , we will in t roduce five predicate logics wi thout the some s t ruc tu re rules (except ZJ), Z.BCA, .LBCB, ZBCC,, .LBC.K, and JLJ. 1%r each of them, the cut el imination theorem holds. Then, we will introduce: a Kr ipke type semantics wi th vary ing domain (a semantics with cons tan t domain has been given b y I t . Ono [4]). In the proofs of the completeness theorems for those logics (except .SJ), we can no t cons t ruc t t t en ldn ' s theory . I t is closely re la ted with the fac t t ha t nei ther the sequent A ^ (B v C) -->(An B ) v (AA C) nor the sequent A ^ 3xB(x)--->3x(AA B(x)) can be p roved in those logics wi thout the contract ion rule. So, we mus t p rove the completeness theorems for those logics wi thout using Henkin ' s construct ion b y changing the in terpre ta t ion of v and 3 . We assume the familiarity" wi th [3] and [5]. 1. Syntact ica l analys i s I n the following, we fix a language ~ for predicate logics. The language .Sf contains __1, T ( truth) , ~ , v , ^ , &, V and 3 as logical connect ives. W e suppose t ha t 5e contains nei ther funct ion symbols nor individual cons tants . W e r e m a r k here tha t it does no t necessarily hold in L.BCA t h a t A-->-V is p rovab le even if -~A is provable . On the other hand, in ZBCA, T-->A is also provable if -+A is provable . I n any sys tem with the weakening rule, bo th sequents A-->T and m -+A are provable if -~A is provable . :~ow we will in t roduce a basic logical sys tem called ZBCA. l~oughly speaking, ZBC~A is a formal sys tem obta ined f rom Gentzen 's sys tem Z J for intuit ionist ic predicate logic, b y eliminating all the s t ruc ture rules. In i t i a l sequents of .~.BCA are either of the form F~ J_~ A->A

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Relational Decomposition

We introduce relational decomposition, a technique for formally reducing termination-insensitive relational program logics to unary logics, that is program logics for one-execution properties. Generalizing the approach of selfcomposition, we develop a notion of interpolants that decompose along the phrase structure, and relate these interpolants to unary and relational predicate transformers. I...

متن کامل

Rules and Arithmetics

This paper is concerned with the logical structure of arithmetical the ories We survey results concerning logics and admissible rules of con structive arithmetical theories We prove a new theorem the admissible propositional rules of Heyting Arithmetic are the same as the admissible propositional rules of Intuitionistic Propositional Logic We provide some further insights concerning predicate l...

متن کامل

(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare

Recent years have witnessed a parallel and seemingly contradictory trend towards both the standardization and the customization of healthcare and medical treatment. Here, we explore what is meant by ‘standardization’ and ‘customization’ in healthcare settings and explore the implications of these changes for healthcare delivery. We frame the paradox of these divergent and opposing factors in te...

متن کامل

On maximal intermediate predicate constructive logics

We extend to the predicate frame a previous characterization of the maximal intermediate propositional constructive logics. This provides a technique to get maximal intermediate predicate constructive logics starting from suitable sets of classically valid predicate formulae we call maximal nonstandard predicate constructive logics. As an example of this technique, we exhibit two maximal interm...

متن کامل

On Reduced Semantics for Fuzzy Predicate Logics

Our work is a contribution to the model-theoretic study of equality-free fuzzy predicate logics. We present a reduced semantics and we prove a completeness theorem of the logics with respect to this semantics. The main concepts being studied are the Leibniz congruence and the relative relation. On the one hand, the Leibniz congruence of a model identifies the elements that are indistinguishable...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Studia Logica

دوره 45  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1986